Stabilize VideoStabilize shaky video footages from GoPro, iPhone, etc. No matter you are a seasoned pro or a beginner, the 4K video editor helps edit even your (10-bit) 4K HDR videos in a streamlined workflow. Easy & Advanced Editings All Covered in Toolbox.
Best Pro For Video Editing 2015 Software That TrulyPlayback got slightly choppy towards the end, but that was the only real frustrating issue. On a 2015 13' Macbook Pro with an i5, I was able to edit a 3-4 minute 4K video in Final Cut Pro X on it easily without using proxies. Remove NoiseRemove/reduce Upgrading from a 2015 iMac to 2019 for Video EditingSketchUp is a premier 3D design software that truly makes 3D modeling for everyone, with a simple to learn yet robust toolset that empowers you to create.level 1.Contents: 6 Best Macs for video editing. My work consists mostly of video editing, writing blogs, and general use work like emails.Hi there, I'm Ann Young - a professional blogger, read more. It’s simply my experience upgrading from the Late 2015 27″ iMac to the early 2019 model.![]() ![]() Radeon Pro 580X with 8GB of GDDR5 memoryThese machines sell for almost $3600 in Australia, but for some great reason, they are much cheaper at Office Works. 8GB of 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable up to 64GB 3.7GHz 6-core ninth-generation Intel Core i5 processor The specs for the machine are as follows. The performance boost over working from the internal Fusion drive or external storage drive is unparalleled. If you’re not working like this, you should. I shoot with Panasonic cameras in 4k and always import my footage to a Samsung T5 running from the USB3 ports. Final Cut Pro X Performance Reasons for UpgradingI have a really great way of working with my 2015 iMac. The 2015 iMac on the left and the 2019 iMac on the right. Color grading increased issues with playback. Unable to use the video preview at full resolution I started to notice with a lot of the 4k files that the 2015 iMac would struggle with a few things in the timeline. My projects are getting more and more complicated as my experience increases. I shoot video and edit it. This was also very expected as the machine was getting older. The iMac struggled with 10-bit 4k footage.I also noticed the export time was increasing as the projects got more complicated. Some transitions were unable to playback without being pre-rendered. A “better” experience in the timeline and fewer jitters and hangups.This is where it will be a deal maker or deal-breaker depending on your situation. Real-time playback of fast motion and transitions Preview video at full resolution at 50% size YouTube compresses it back down, so there’s no point for me doing this.I usually export to “ Apple Devices” at 3860 x 2160. The file size is too big to upload on the Australian internet upload limitations. There are two reasons I never use this codec. I never have to export files in the H.265 codec. This ended up being the video located below. I’ve uploaded hundreds of videos with this video codec and have had zero complaints about the quality.The first test I ran was a 4:43 project with color correction, complex titles, music, and effects added. It also drops the file size about 10x over H.264. Do you use background Rendering?If you prefer to use background rendering, the export times are almost identical. This was some good news and some bad news. I was pretty disappointed that a much, much newer CPU and GPU made so very little difference with this codec.The Export Times were as follows without Background Render enabled:Here we go! I saved just over 2 minutes on a 4:43 project. As soon as I hit save, I let the computer render untouched until I saw the “Rendering Complete” notification pop up.I have to say. Break reminder app for macThe expense of the computer versus the times saved in this regard was not worth it. This doesn’t mean it’s light years ahead, either. Was background rendering faster on the 2019 iMac?Overall, yes. When you do hundreds of projects a year, you’ll save a lot of time. If you are exporting in H.264, the upgrade will make a lot of sense.What about the Editing Experience inside of FCPX?The editing experience was better on the new 2019 iMac, but it still had some severe limitations. This is where the upgrade would make total sense! Background Rendering was currently off.Now we are talking! This is where the 2019 iMac takes more advantage of system resources and new technology and exports the file faster. The project was 17:25 and included LUTs, complex titles, music, and many effects. When Exporting Video to the H.264 codec.This comparison was on a much more complicated project. It definitely handled the project in a smoother way, even in “better performance” mode. Some of these more elaborate transitions were unable to preview in real-time without background rendering on or without having to drop to “better performance” mode.Another benefit of the new 2019 i5 iMac was it was also able to preview x4, x8, and x20 footage without glitching! This felt amazing to see and was a great experience.Once I started adding my titles, transitions, color corrections, and regular attributes, it struggled. Over the years, I’ve purchased a number of third-party plugins from Motion FX. (2015 left / 2019 right) How about the ThunderBolt 3 ports?This was another feature I was keen on testing out. It’s just too much for your eyes to handle unless you are in a well-lit room.Overall, I was very disappointed with the screen “upgrade.” I can barely see any difference in the screens. The internet has a great way of hyping up incremental upgrades.I never, ever use my iMac with the screen brightness all of the way up. This was so minimal as well. The only difference I could see was the fonts looked brighter. What about the Screen Upgrade?Having both screens next to each other allowed me to see if the 500nits screen was anything special. Again, I was disappointed as transferring files were “about the same” from my eye-ball tests. I thought for sure this would account for some of the performance upgrades when working from the external SSD. My Samsung T-5 drives are supported by either USB3.0 and ThunderBolt 3. I was hoping for a 20-30% export speed increase for my needs, but it only came down to seconds slower with my older 2015 iMac. If you only export videos to YouTube, then the upgrade probably isn’t worth it. Playback on the new iMac was better for more complicated projects, but I still had to view the video in “better performance.”If better performance mode doesn’t bother you, then it is an upgrade. I would suggest upgrading if your projects and effects are complex. If you export to “Apple Devices” or “Web Devices,” the upgrade isn’t worth it. The editing experience won’t be as good as the iMac Pro, but the combination of the ninth generation i5 and Radeon 580x handle the encoding better. I knew as soon as I made the comparisons for my particular workflow, I felt like I just made a terrible investment, and the upgrade wasn’t worth it to me.As I mentioned, if you are exporting to H.264, this new machine will save you a lot of time. Is the 2019 iMac worth it?Most of my YouTube videos fall between the 6-12 minute mark, and being I am not exporting to H.264, I saw no reason to keep the 2019 iMac and returned it the following morning. This will help speed up background rendering and overall improve the editing experience. I suggest upgrading the i5 to the Intel Core i9. If you want something more cost-effective and almost as good, then customize the 2019 iMac. I wrote a detailed article on this, which you can check out here. What about the graphics card? The 580X is very good considering what you are getting but if you want the top end iMac, then get the Radeon Pro Vega 48.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorQuintin ArchivesCategories |